Ric Komarek, CFP
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Mission Vision Values
  • Elements
  • Financial Wellness Score

Midterm Elections—What Do They Mean for Markets?

11/1/2018

0 Comments

 
While the outcomes of the elections are uncertain, one thing we can count on is that plenty of opinions and prognostications will be floated in the days to come. In financial circles, this will almost assuredly include any potential for perceived impact on markets. But should long-term investors focus on midterm elections?...
0 Comments

Quarterly Market Review for 2018 Q3

10/9/2018

0 Comments

 
0 Comments

Total Cost of Ownership

10/2/2018

0 Comments

 
Costs matter. Whether you’re buying a car or selecting an investment strategy, the costs you expect to pay are likely to be an important factor in making any major financial decision.

People rely on a lot of different information about costs to help inform these decisions. When you buy a car, for example, the sticker price indicates approximately how much you can expect to pay for the car itself. But the costs of car ownership do not end there. Taxes, insurance, fuel, routine maintenance, and unexpected repairs are also important considerations in the overall cost of a car. Some of these costs are easily observed, while others are more difficult to assess. Similarly, when investing in mutual funds, different variables need to be considered to evaluate how cost‑effective a strategy may be for a particular investor.

EXPENSE RATIOS
Mutual funds have many costs, all of which affect the net return to investors. One easily observable cost is the expense ratio. Like the sticker price of a car, the expense ratio tells you a lot about what you can expect to pay for an investment strategy. Expense ratios strongly influence fund selection for many investors, and it’s easy to see why.
​
Exhibit 1 illustrates the outperformance rate, or the percentage of funds that beat their category index, for active equity mutual funds over the 15-year period ending December 31, 2017. To see the link between expense ratio and performance, outperformance rates are shown for quartiles of funds sorted by their expense ratio. As the chart shows, while active funds have mostly lagged indices across the board, the outperformance rate has been inversely related to expense ratio. Just 6% of funds in the highest expense ratio quartile beat their index, compared to 25% for the lowest expense ratio group.
Picture
This data indicates that a high expense ratio presents a challenging hurdle for funds to overcome, especially over longer time horizons. From the investor’s point of view, an expense ratio of 0.25% vs. 1.25% means savings of $10,000 per year on every $1 million invested. As Exhibit 2 helps to illustrate, those dollars can really add up over time
Picture
GOING BEYOND THE EXPENSE RATIO
The poor track record of mutual funds with high expense ratios has led many investors to select mutual funds based on expense ratio alone. However, as with a car’s sticker price, an expense ratio is not an all‑encompassing measure of the cost of ownership. Take, for example, index funds, which often rank near the bottom of their peers on expense ratio.

Index funds are designed to track or match the components of an index formed by an index provider, such as Russell or MSCI. Important decisions in the investment process, such as which securities to include in the index, are outsourced to an index provider and are not within the fund manager’s discretion. For example, the prescribed reconstitution schedule for an index, which is the process of deleting or adding certain stocks to the index, may cause index funds to buy stocks when buy demand is high and sell stocks when buy demand is low. This price-insensitive buying and selling may be required so that the index fund can stay true to its investment mandate of tracking an underlying index. This can result in sub-optimal transaction prices for the index fund and diminished overall returns. In other words, for a given amount of trading (or turnover), the cost per unit of trading may be higher for such a strictly regimented approach to investing. Moreover, this cost will not appear explicitly to investors assessing such a fund on expense ratio alone. Further, because indices are reconstituted infrequently (typically once per year), funds seeking to track them may also be forced to buy and sell holdings based on stale eligibility criteria. For example, the characteristics of a stock considered value1 as of the last reconstitution date may change over time, but between reconstitution dates, those changes would not affect that stock’s inclusion or weighting in a value index. That means incoming cash flows to a value index fund could actually be used to purchase stocks that currently look more like growth stocks2 and vice versa. Metaphorically, these managers’ attention may be more focused on the rear-view mirror than on the road ahead for investors.

For active approaches like stock picking, both the total amount of trading and the cost per trade may be high. If a manager trades excessively or inefficiently, costs like commissions and price impact from trading can eat away at returns. Viewed through the lens of our car analogy, this impact is like the toll on your vehicle from incessantly jamming the brakes or accelerating quickly. Subjecting the car to such treatment may result in added wear and tear and greater fuel consumption, increasing your total cost of ownership. Similarly, excessive trading can lead to negative tax consequences for a fund, which can increase the cost of ownership for investors holding funds in taxable accounts. Such trading costs can be reduced by avoiding unnecessary turnover and seeking to minimize the cost per trade.
​
In contrast to both highly regimented indexing and highturnover active strategies, employing a flexible investment approach that reduces the need for immediacy, and thus enables opportunistic execution, is one way to potentially reduce implicit costs. Keeping turnover low, remaining flexible, and transacting only when the potential benefits of a trade outweigh the costs can help keep overall trading costs down and help reduce the total cost of ownership.
​
CONCLUSION
The total cost of ownership of a mutual fund can be difficult to assess and requires a thorough understanding of costs beyond what an expense ratio can tell investors on its own. We believe investors should look beyond any one cost metric and instead evaluate the total cost of ownership of an investment solution

Read More
0 Comments

When Will We Get Back To Average Market Returns...

4/17/2018

0 Comments

 
Average returns don't actually occur in any given year. Investors should expect above average and below average returns in any given year.  The key is a long term perspective on performance. 
0 Comments

A Look at Dividend Yields Around the World

12/6/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
the yields on international stocks are higher than those available from many government bonds today [link]

0 Comments

Stuck in Cash

11/8/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
U.S. investors continue to hold a sizable percentage of their assets in low- or no-return cash investments and expect to remain in this holding pattern with no major shift out of cash over the next year. Despite rising concerns about meeting investment goals, most investors are stuck in place with current portfolio allocations [link]

0 Comments

Pay Your Future Self First

4/24/2013

0 Comments

 
0 Comments

Why Diversify?

4/9/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
A concentrated portfolio places you in the line of fire every day...
diversification_brochure.pdf
File Size: 1412 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Feel Good About Doing Well

4/9/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
You can put your money where your heart is...
feel_good_about_doing_well.pdf
File Size: 3843 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

So does past performance really matter?

1/11/2013

0 Comments

 
The phrase “past performance is not an indicator of future outcomes” (or some 
variation thereof) can be found in the fine print of most mutual fund literature. 
Yet due to either force of habit or conviction, investors and advisors consider 
past performance and related metrics to be important factors in fund selection.  
So does past performance really matter?

Read More
0 Comments

    Archives

    April 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    August 2015
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    August 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    October 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011

    Categories

    All
    401k
    College
    Economy
    Financial
    Insurance
    Investing
    IRA
    Life Insurance
    Market
    Medicare
    Politics
    Quarterly Market Review
    Retirement
    ROTH
    Saving
    Social Security
    Taxes

    RSS Feed

ABOUT RIC

Ric is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER and investment advisor. Click here to learn more.

LEARN MORE

Blog
Contact
​Voicemail
​

FOLLOW RIC

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Mission Vision Values
  • Elements
  • Financial Wellness Score
Facebook Chat Widget by Digital Inspiration